Experiments in support and against Spontaneous Generation

The doctrine of spontaneous generation was a widely accepted scientific theory that held that living creatures could arise from nonliving matter and that such processes were commonplace and regular . It was based on the observation of various phenomena that seemed to support the idea that life could emerge from inanimate material, such as dust, mud, or decaying flesh. For example, some people believed that mice could be generated from rags and wheat kernels, or that maggots could appear on rotting meat.

The theory of spontaneous generation was coherently synthesized by the Greek philosopher and naturalist Aristotle (384–322 BC), who compiled and expanded the work of earlier natural philosophers and the various ancient explanations for the appearance of organisms. Aristotle proposed that life arose from nonliving material if the material contained pneuma (“vital heat”) . He also classified living beings into two types: those that are generated from seeds (such as plants and animals), and those that are generated spontaneously (such as insects and worms). He explained the latter type by suggesting that some parts of the earth had a natural tendency to produce life, and that different kinds of living things could arise from different kinds of substrates. For instance, he claimed that seashells were spontaneously generated from slime, sand, or rocks, depending on the nature of the seabed.

Aristotle`s theory of spontaneous generation was influential and widely accepted for two millennia. It was not until the 17th and 18th centuries that it was challenged by the experiments of Francesco Redi and Lazzaro Spallanzani, and finally disproved by Louis Pasteur and John Tyndall in the 19th century .

Aristotle was one of the earliest and most influential proponents of the doctrine of spontaneous generation. He believed that life could arise from nonliving matter under certain conditions. He based his theory on his observations of nature and his interpretation of ancient texts.

According to Aristotle, nonliving matter could produce living beings if it contained pneuma, which he translated as "vital heat" or "vital force". Pneuma was a subtle substance that pervaded the air and the cosmos, and was responsible for movement, growth and change. Aristotle thought that pneuma could be transferred from the air to the nonliving matter, and then activate its potential to generate life.

Aristotle gave several examples of spontaneous generation in his works. He claimed that some insects, such as bees and ants, were produced from the dew that fell on plants. He also asserted that some aquatic animals, such as fish and frogs, were generated from the mud that was stirred up by the sun`s heat or by rain. He even suggested that some mammals, such as mice and hyenas, could be formed from putrefying soil or dung.

Aristotle`s theory of spontaneous generation was widely accepted by many ancient and medieval scholars, who tried to explain the origin of various organisms using his principles. His theory also influenced his views on biology, cosmology and metaphysics. For Aristotle, spontaneous generation was a natural phenomenon that demonstrated the inherent power and creativity of matter.

One of the supporters of spontaneous generation was the English naturalist John Turberville Needham (1713–1781), who was also a Catholic priest and a microscopist. Needham conducted a series of experiments with infusions, which are liquids that contain organic matter derived from plants or animals. He believed that boiling would kill any living things in the infusions, and that sealing the containers would prevent any external contamination. He expected that the infusions would remain clear and sterile after these treatments.

However, Needham observed that large numbers of microorganisms subsequently developed in the infusions, even after they were exposed to intense heat in sealed tubes for 30 minutes. He reported his findings in 1748, claiming that the microorganisms were generated spontaneously from the nonliving material in the infusions. He argued that there was a "life force" that could produce living things from inanimate matter. He also suggested that different types of microorganisms could arise from different types of infusions, such as hay, corn, or pepper .

Needham`s experiments seemed to provide strong evidence for spontaneous generation, and they were widely accepted by many naturalists at the time. However, they were also challenged by other scientists who repeated his experiments with different methods and obtained conflicting results. One of them was the Italian physiologist Lazzaro Spallanzani, who published his findings around 1775.

Needham was not the only one who supported the theory of spontaneous generation in the 18th century. Several other naturalists and philosophers also conducted experiments and made observations that seemed to confirm the idea that life could arise from nonliving matter.

One of them was Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, a French naturalist who proposed that living beings were composed of organic molecules that could be rearranged into different forms by external forces. He suggested that the heat of the sun, the moisture of the air, and the electric fluid could produce spontaneous generation in certain circumstances. He also claimed that he had observed worms and insects emerging from plant and animal matter after exposing them to heat and moisture.

Another supporter of spontaneous generation was John Turbeville Needham`s nephew, Henry Baker, an English naturalist and microscopist. He published a book in 1743 titled Employment for the Microscope, in which he described various microscopic creatures that he believed were spontaneously generated from vegetable infusions, such as vinegar eels, cheese mites, and vinegar flies. He argued that these creatures were too small and simple to be produced by sexual reproduction, and that they must have originated from the fermentation of organic substances.

A third proponent of spontaneous generation was Erasmus Darwin, an English physician and natural philosopher who was also the grandfather of Charles Darwin. He wrote a poem in 1791 called The Botanic Garden, in which he speculated that life began in the oceans from microscopic organisms that gradually evolved into more complex forms. He also suggested that some animals, such as oysters and sponges, could still be produced by spontaneous generation from mud or sand.

These and other proponents of spontaneous generation based their arguments on empirical observations and experiments, but they also faced criticism and challenges from their contemporaries who favored the alternative theory of preformationism, which held that all living beings were preformed in miniature within the eggs or sperm of their parents. The debate between spontaneous generation and preformationism continued until the 19th century, when new experiments by Pasteur and Tyndall finally disproved the former and established the latter as the scientific consensus.

One of the most bizarre examples of spontaneous generation was proposed by Jan Baptista van Helmont, a 17th century Flemish scientist and physician. He claimed that he could create mice from rags and wheat kernels in a simple experiment. He wrote:

If a soiled shirt is placed in the opening of a vessel containing grains of wheat, the reaction of the leaven in the shirt with fumes from the wheat will, after approximately 21 days, transform the wheat into mice.

Van Helmont believed that the vital force or pneuma in the air and the organic matter could produce living beings without the need of parents. He also suggested that scorpions could be generated from basil leaves placed between bricks and exposed to sunlight.

Of course, van Helmont`s experiments were flawed and misleading. He did not consider the possibility that mice or scorpions could enter his vessels or bricks from outside sources. He also did not account for the fact that his supposed new creatures were already adult and capable of reproduction. In reality, his rags and wheat kernels provided ideal food sources and shelter for mouse populations to flourish.

Van Helmont`s ideas were not widely accepted by his contemporaries, but they illustrate the persistence and diversity of spontaneous generation theories throughout history.

The Italian physician and poet Francesco Redi was one of the first to question the spontaneous origin of living things. Having observed the development of maggots and flies on decaying meat, Redi in 1668 devised a number of experiments, all pointing to the same conclusion: if flies are excluded from rotten meat, maggots do not develop. On meat exposed to air, however, eggs laid by flies develop into maggots.

He tested the spontaneous creation of maggots by placing fresh meat in each of two different jars. One jar was left open; the other was covered with a cloth. Days later, the open jar contained maggots, whereas the covered jar contained no maggots. He did note that maggots were found on the exterior surface of the cloth that covered the jar. Redi successfully demonstrated that the maggots came from fly eggs.

He performed other experiments with maggots, including one where he placed dead flies or maggots in sealed jars with meat and observed living maggots did not appear. However, when he placed living flies were placed in a jar with meat, maggots did appear. Redi concluded maggots came from living flies, not from rotting meat or from dead flies or maggots.

The experiments with maggots and flies were important not only because they refuted spontaneous generation, but also because they used control groups, applying the scientific method to test a hypothesis. Redi has been called the "founder of experimental biology" and the "father of modern parasitology".

One of the most prominent supporters of spontaneous generation was John Turberville Needham, an English naturalist who claimed that he had observed the growth of microorganisms in boiled infusions of plant and animal matter that were sealed in glass tubes. He argued that the heat treatment was not enough to kill all the "vital atoms" that could generate life from nonliving matter.

However, his experiments were challenged by Lazzaro Spallanzani, an Italian priest and physiologist who repeated Needham`s experiments with more rigorous methods. Spallanzani boiled the infusions for longer periods of time and sealed the tubes by melting the glass, thus preventing any air from entering. He also performed control experiments with unsealed tubes that were exposed to air. He found that no microorganisms appeared in the sealed tubes, even after months of observation, while the unsealed tubes showed abundant growth.

Spallanzani concluded that Needham had not heated his tubes long enough, nor had he sealed them properly, and that the microorganisms he observed came from the air and not from spontaneous generation. He also suggested that air was necessary for the survival of microorganisms, but not for their origin. Spallanzani`s experiments paved the way for further research by Louis Pasteur, who finally disproved the theory of spontaneous generation almost a century later.

One of the most conclusive experiments that disproved spontaneous generation was conducted by the French microbiologist Louis Pasteur in 1859. Pasteur boiled a meat broth in a flask that had a long neck that curved downward, like that of a goose or swan . The idea was that the bend in the neck prevented falling particles from reaching the broth, while still allowing the free flow of air. The flask remained free of growth for an extended period. When the flask was turned so that particles could fall down the bends, the broth quickly became clouded. This indicated that the living organisms that grew in the broth came from outside, as spores on dust, rather than spontaneously generated within the broth. Pasteur`s experiment showed that there was no spontaneous generation, since the boiled broth, if never reexposed to air, remained sterile. This not only settled the philosophical problem of the origin of life at the time but also placed on solid ground the new science of bacteriology, which relied on proven techniques of sterilization and aseptic manipulation.

Pasteur`s experiment was so convincing that it led to the formulation of a fundamental principle of biology: the law of biogenesis. This law states that life only comes from previously existing life. In other words, living organisms do not arise spontaneously from nonliving matter. The law of biogenesis contradicted the ancient doctrine of spontaneous generation and established the basis for the modern understanding of the origin and evolution of life. The law of biogenesis also has important implications for medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology, as it implies that living organisms can only be produced or modified by other living organisms.

While Pasteur`s experiment was widely accepted as a decisive refutation of spontaneous generation, some critics still argued that his swan-necked flasks did not allow enough air to enter and that air was vital for the generation of life. To address this objection, the English physicist John Tyndall devised a more sophisticated apparatus that could show the presence of particulate matter in air by using a beam of light.

Tyndall`s apparatus consisted of a glass tube with two chambers connected by a narrow neck. The lower chamber contained a nutrient broth that could support the growth of microorganisms. The upper chamber had an opening to allow air to enter and exit. Tyndall also installed a mechanism to seal the tube or break the neck if needed. He then sterilized the broth by boiling it and let it cool down. He then illuminated the tube with a beam of light and observed whether the air in the upper chamber scattered the light or not.

Tyndall found that when the air was pure, meaning it contained no particulate matter, the beam of light passed through without scattering and the broth remained clear. However, when the air was contaminated with dust or other particles, the beam of light was visible as it scattered and the broth became cloudy with microbial growth. Tyndall concluded that the particles in the air carried living germs that could contaminate the broth and cause spontaneous generation to appear. He also showed that by filtering the air through cotton wool, he could remove the particles and prevent microbial growth.

Tyndall`s experiment confirmed Pasteur`s findings and demonstrated that air itself was not enough to generate life, but rather it was the living organisms carried by air that could do so. His experiment also explained why some earlier experiments had inconsistent results, as they depended on the quality of the air used. Tyndall`s work, together with Pasteur`s, finally put an end to the doctrine of spontaneous generation and established the principle of biogenesis: life only comes from preexisting life.

We are Compiling this Section. Thanks for your understanding.