Laboratory diagnosis, treatment and prevention of Leptospira interrogans

Leptospira interrogans is a spirochete bacterium that causes leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animals. Leptospirosis can manifest as a mild flu-like illness or a severe multisystemic infection that can lead to organ failure and death. The diagnosis of leptospirosis is challenging because of the nonspecific clinical presentation, the wide range of potential sources of exposure, and the diversity of serological and molecular methods available. In this article, we will review the main laboratory techniques for the detection and identification of Leptospira interrogans in clinical specimens.

The laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis can be divided into two main approaches: direct and indirect. Direct methods aim to detect the presence of the bacterium or its components in the specimens, while indirect methods measure the host immune response to the infection.

Direct methods include microscopy, culture, and molecular techniques. Microscopy involves the examination of specimens under darkfield or immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize the thin and motile spirochetes. However, microscopy has several limitations, such as low sensitivity, low specificity, and dependence on skilled personnel and equipment. Culture involves the inoculation of specimens into special media that support the growth of Leptospira interrogans. Culture is considered the gold standard for direct diagnosis, as it allows for isolation and identification of the bacterium at the serovar level. However, culture is also time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to contamination. Molecular techniques involve the amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences of Leptospira interrogans by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other methods. Molecular techniques offer high sensitivity and specificity, rapid results, and potential for genotyping and epidemiological studies. However, molecular techniques are also expensive, require specialized equipment and trained personnel, and may not be widely available in endemic areas.

Indirect methods include serology and antigen detection. Serology involves the measurement of antibodies against Leptospira interrogans in serum samples by various tests, such as microscopic agglutination test (MAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex agglutination test (LAT), or immunochromatographic test (ICT). Serology is the most widely used method for diagnosis of leptospirosis, as it is relatively simple, inexpensive, and widely available. However, serology also has some drawbacks, such as cross-reactivity with other pathogens, variability in antibody response among individuals and serovars, and difficulty in distinguishing between acute and past infections. Antigen detection involves the identification of specific antigens of Leptospira interrogans in urine or serum samples by immunological methods, such as ELISA or ICT. Antigen detection offers an advantage over serology in that it can detect active infection before antibody response develops. However, antigen detection also suffers from low sensitivity and specificity, limited availability of commercial kits, and potential interference from other substances in the specimens.

In summary, laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis requires a combination of different methods that depend on various factors, such as the stage of infection, the type of specimen, the availability of resources, and the purpose of testing. A comprehensive approach that integrates clinical history, epidemiological data, and laboratory results is essential for accurate diagnosis and management of leptospirosis cases.

The diagnosis of leptospirosis can be made by direct detection of the causative agent, Leptospira interrogans, or by indirect methods such as serology or molecular techniques. The choice of specimen depends on the stage of the disease, the availability of laboratory facilities, and the sensitivity and specificity of the test method.

Blood

Blood is the most commonly used specimen for direct detection of Leptospira interrogans in the early phase of the disease, when the bacteria are present in the bloodstream. Blood can be collected in a heparin tube and used for microscopic examination and culture. Microscopy can be performed by darkfield microscopy, immunofluorescence, or immunohistochemistry to visualize the spirochetes. Culture can be performed on special media such as Fletcher, EMJH, Stuart`s, or Tween 80-albumin media supplemented with antibiotics. However, both microscopy and culture have limitations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time. Therefore, molecular methods such as PCR are preferred for rapid and accurate detection of Leptospira interrogans in blood specimens.

CSF

CSF is another specimen that can be used for direct detection of Leptospira interrogans in cases of leptospirosis with neurological involvement, such as meningitis or encephalitis. CSF can be collected by lumbar puncture and used for microscopic examination and culture as described above. However, the number of bacteria in CSF is usually low and may require concentration or enrichment techniques to increase the yield. Molecular methods such as PCR are also useful for detecting Leptospira interrogans in CSF specimens.

Urine

Urine is a useful specimen for direct detection of Leptospira interrogans in the later phase of the disease, when the bacteria are excreted in the urine. Urine can be collected by midstream or catheterized method and used for microscopic examination and culture as described above. However, urine may contain other microorganisms or substances that can interfere with the detection of Leptospira interrogans. Therefore, molecular methods such as PCR are also recommended for detecting Leptospira interrogans in urine specimens.

Tissues

Tissues are specimens that can be used for direct detection of Leptospira interrogans in cases of severe or fatal leptospirosis, when the bacteria are disseminated to various organs such as liver, kidney, lung, spleen, or heart. Tissues can be obtained by biopsy or autopsy and used for microscopic examination and culture as described above. However, tissues may require special processing and staining techniques to enhance the visibility of Leptospira interrogans. Molecular methods such as PCR are also applicable for detecting Leptospira interrogans in tissue specimens.

Serum

Serum is the most commonly used specimen for indirect detection of Leptospira interrogans by serology. Serology is based on the measurement of antibodies produced by the host in response to infection with Leptospira interrogans. Serum can be collected by venipuncture and used for various serological tests such as microscopic agglutination test (MAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex agglutination test (LAT), immunochromatographic test (ICT), or lepto dipstick assay (LDA). Serology has advantages in terms of availability, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness. However, serology has limitations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, and interpretation. Therefore, serology should be performed in conjunction with clinical presentation and exposure history to confirm the diagnosis of leptospirosis.

One of the methods for laboratory diagnosis of Leptospira interrogans is microscopy, which involves examining the specimens under a microscope for the presence of the bacteria. However, microscopy has several limitations and challenges that affect its sensitivity and specificity.

The first limitation is that leptospires are very thin (0.1 to 0.2 micrometers in diameter and 6 to 20 micrometers in length), which makes them difficult to see by conventional light microscopy. They are also flexible and motile, which can cause them to be mistaken for other structures or artifacts. Moreover, they cannot be detected by common staining techniques such as Gram stain or silver stain, which are used for other bacteria.

The second limitation is that the number of leptospires in the specimens may be low or variable, depending on the stage of infection, the type of specimen, and the storage and transport conditions. For example, blood samples may have more leptospires in the early phase of infection, while urine samples may have more leptospires in the later phase. However, both blood and urine samples may have negative results if they are not collected or processed properly.

The third limitation is that microscopy requires skilled personnel and adequate equipment, which may not be available or accessible in some settings. Microscopy also takes time and may not provide a rapid diagnosis when needed.

To overcome these limitations, alternative techniques have been developed or adapted for microscopy of Leptospira interrogans. These include:

• Darkfield microscopy: This technique uses a special condenser that illuminates the specimen from the side, creating a dark background and a bright image of the bacteria. Darkfield microscopy can enhance the visibility of leptospires and their characteristic corkscrew-like movement. However, it is still relatively insensitive and nonspecific, as it can also detect other spirochetes or debris.
• Fluorescence microscopy: This technique uses fluorescent dyes or antibodies that bind to specific antigens on the surface of leptospires, making them glow under ultraviolet light. Fluorescence microscopy can increase the sensitivity and specificity of microscopy, as well as allow for serological typing of leptospires. However, it requires expensive reagents and equipment, and may be affected by background fluorescence or cross-reactivity.
• Immunohistochemistry: This technique uses antibodies that are labeled with enzymes or chromogens that produce a color reaction when exposed to a substrate. Immunohistochemistry can be used to detect leptospires in tissue samples, such as kidney or liver biopsies. It can also provide information on the distribution and severity of tissue damage caused by leptospires. However, it requires specialized laboratory facilities and trained personnel.

In summary, microscopy is a useful but limited method for laboratory diagnosis of Leptospira interrogans. It can provide direct evidence of infection, but it has low sensitivity and specificity due to the characteristics of leptospires and the quality of specimens. Alternative techniques such as darkfield microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and immunohistochemistry can improve the performance of microscopy, but they also have their own drawbacks and challenges. Therefore, microscopy should be combined with other methods such as culture or serology for a more accurate and comprehensive diagnosis of leptospirosis.

One of the methods to diagnose Leptospira interrogans is to culture the bacteria from the specimens collected from the patients. However, culturing leptospires is not easy and requires special conditions and techniques. Here are some of the challenges and solutions for culturing Leptospira interrogans:

• Media: Leptospires are fastidious bacteria that need specific nutrients and environmental factors to grow. They can be cultured on specially formulated media that contain serum, peptone, salts, and other supplements. Some of the commonly used media are Fletcher, EMJH (Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris), Stuart’s, or Tween 80-albumin media. These media are usually supplemented with antibiotics such as neomycin and 5-fluorouracil to inhibit the growth of other microorganisms that may contaminate the specimens.
• Temperature: Leptospires are mesophilic bacteria that grow best at temperatures between 28°C and 30°C. Therefore, the cultures should be incubated at these temperatures and not at the usual 37°C that is used for most bacteria. The cultures should also be protected from light and excessive shaking or agitation.
• Time: Leptospires grow slowly and may take several weeks or even months to appear in culture. The generation time of leptospires is estimated to be between 6 and 16 hours, which is much longer than most bacteria. Therefore, the cultures should be monitored regularly by darkfield microscopy for up to 4 months before they are considered negative. However, most cultures are positive within 2 weeks of incubation.
• Detection: The growth of leptospires in culture can be detected by darkfield microscopy, which allows the visualization of the thin, motile, spiral-shaped bacteria. However, darkfield microscopy requires a skilled operator and may not be available in all laboratories. Alternatively, fluorescent antibody staining or other immunohistochemical techniques can be used to identify leptospires in culture.

Culturing Leptospira interrogans is a valuable method for diagnosis and epidemiology of leptospirosis. However, it is not widely used in clinical settings due to its low sensitivity, long turnaround time, and technical difficulties. Therefore, it is usually combined with other methods such as microscopy, serology, or molecular methods for a more accurate and timely diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Serology is the main method of confirming the diagnosis of leptospirosis in most cases. It involves detecting the presence and level of antibodies against Leptospira interrogans in the patient`s serum. The antibodies are usually produced by the immune system 5 to 7 days after infection and can persist for several months or years.

There are various tests available for serological diagnosis of leptospirosis, each with different advantages and limitations. Some of the commonly used tests are:

• Microscopic agglutination test (MAT): This is considered the `gold standard` test for leptospirosis, as it can indicate the likely infecting serogroup or serovar of Leptospira interrogans . It involves mixing serial dilutions of the patient`s serum with live cultures of different Leptospira strains and observing for agglutination under darkfield microscopy. A positive result is indicated by a 50% or more reduction in motility of the bacteria compared with a control. The MAT requires a skilled technician, a panel of representative Leptospira strains, and a paired serum sample (acute and convalescent) to increase sensitivity and specificity . The MAT may also cross-react with other spirochetes or bacteria, leading to false-positive results.
• Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): This is a more convenient and rapid test than MAT, as it can be performed on a single serum sample using standardized reagents and equipment . ELISA can detect IgM and IgG antibodies separately, which can help differentiate between acute and past infection. IgM antibodies appear early within one week of illness, reach peak levels in third or fourth week and then decline slowly and become undetectable within six month. IgG antibodies appear later than IgM, reach peak level after few weeks of illness and may persist at low level for years. ELISA has relatively good sensitivity and specificity, but may vary depending on the antigen used and the cutoff value chosen . ELISA may also cross-react with other pathogens or non-pathogenic Leptospira species, leading to false-positive results.
• Latex agglutination test: This is a simple and rapid test that can be performed at the point of care or in resource-limited settings . It involves mixing a drop of the patient`s serum with latex particles coated with Leptospira antigens and observing for agglutination within minutes. A positive result is indicated by visible clumping of the latex particles. The latex agglutination test is mainly useful for screening purposes, as it has low sensitivity and specificity and cannot differentiate between serogroups or serovars of Leptospira interrogans . It may also cross-react with other infections or non-pathogenic Leptospira species, leading to false-positive results.
• Lepto dipstick assay: This is another simple and rapid test that can be performed at the point of care or in resource-limited settings . It involves dipping a strip coated with Leptospira antigens into the patient`s serum or urine sample and reading the result within 15 minutes. A positive result is indicated by a colored line on the strip. The lepto dipstick assay can detect IgM antibodies against Leptospira interrogans, which are present in early infection . However, it has low sensitivity and specificity and cannot differentiate between serogroups or serovars of Leptospira interrogans . It may also cross-react with other infections or non-pathogenic Leptospira species, leading to false-positive results.
• Immunochromatographic test (ICT): This is similar to the lepto dipstick assay, but uses a cassette instead of a strip. It also involves dipping a cassette coated with Leptospira antigens into the patient`s serum or urine sample and reading the result within 15 minutes. A positive result is indicated by a colored line on the cassette. The ICT can detect IgM antibodies against Leptospira interrogans, which are present in early infection . However, it has low sensitivity and specificity and cannot differentiate between serogroups or serovars of Leptospira interrogans . It may also cross-react with other infections or non-pathogenic Leptospira species, leading to false-positive results.

Molecular methods are useful for the detection and identification of Leptospira interrogans at the genetic level. They can provide rapid and specific results, especially in the early stages of infection when antibodies are not yet detectable or in cases where culture is not feasible.

One of the most widely used molecular methods is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which amplifies a specific segment of DNA from a sample. PCR can be performed on various specimens, such as blood, urine, CSF, or tissues. PCR can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment and to detect asymptomatic carriers.

Various genes can be targeted by PCR, such as 16S or 23S rRNA or IS1533 insertion sequence. These genes are conserved among different Leptospira species and can be used to differentiate them from other bacteria. However, PCR is not serovar-specific and cannot provide information on the antigenic diversity of Leptospira interrogans.

To overcome this limitation, PCR can be combined with other techniques, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). These techniques can generate different patterns of DNA fragments from different Leptospira serovars and allow for their comparison and identification.

Another molecular method that can be used for genome determination of Leptospira interrogans is whole-genome sequencing (WGS). WGS can provide comprehensive information on the genetic makeup of Leptospira interrogans, including its virulence factors, drug resistance genes, and evolutionary relationships. WGS can also reveal novel Leptospira species or serovars that are not detected by conventional methods.

Molecular methods have several advantages over other diagnostic methods, such as high sensitivity, specificity, speed, and accuracy. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as high cost, technical complexity, and limited availability. Therefore, molecular methods should be used in conjunction with other methods, such as culture and serology, for a comprehensive diagnosis of Leptospira interrogans infection.

Leptospirosis is a potentially serious bacterial infection caused by Leptospira interrogans. It can affect various organs and systems, such as the kidneys, liver, lungs, heart, and nervous system. Leptospirosis can be fatal if left untreated or if complications arise.

The mainstay of treatment for leptospirosis is antimicrobial therapy, which aims to eradicate the bacteria from the body and prevent further damage to the tissues. Antimicrobial therapy should be started as soon as possible after the diagnosis is confirmed or suspected, preferably within the first week of illness.

The choice of antimicrobial agent depends on several factors, such as the severity of the infection, the patient`s age, medical history, allergies, and availability of the drugs. The following are some of the commonly used drugs for treating leptospirosis:

• Doxycycline: This is an oral antibiotic that belongs to the tetracycline class. It is effective against a wide range of bacteria, including Leptospira interrogans. It is the drug of choice for mild to moderate cases of leptospirosis. It is usually given once or twice daily for 7 to 14 days. Doxycycline can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, photosensitivity, and tooth discoloration in children. It should not be used in pregnant or breastfeeding women or in children under 8 years old.
• Penicillin or ampicillin: These are intravenous antibiotics that belong to the beta-lactam class. They are effective against many gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Leptospira interrogans. They are recommended for severe or complicated cases of leptospirosis that require hospitalization. They are usually given every 4 to 6 hours for 7 to 10 days. Penicillin or ampicillin can cause side effects such as allergic reactions, rash, fever, diarrhea, and kidney damage. They should not be used in patients who are allergic to penicillin or other beta-lactams.
• Streptomycin: This is an injectable antibiotic that belongs to the aminoglycoside class. It is effective against many gram-negative bacteria, including Leptospira interrogans. It is an alternative choice for patients who are allergic to penicillin or other beta-lactams. It is usually given once or twice daily for 7 to 10 days. Streptomycin can cause side effects such as hearing loss, kidney damage, and nerve damage. It should not be used in pregnant or breastfeeding women or in patients with kidney or hearing problems.
• Erythromycin: This is an oral antibiotic that belongs to the macrolide class. It is effective against many gram-positive and some gram-negative bacteria, including Leptospira interrogans. It is another alternative choice for patients who are allergic to penicillin or other beta-lactams. It is usually given four times daily for 7 to 14 days. Erythromycin can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and liver damage. It can also interact with other drugs such as warfarin and statins.

In addition to antimicrobial therapy, supportive care is also important for treating leptospirosis. This may include fluid and electrolyte replacement, oxygen therapy, blood transfusion, dialysis, and mechanical ventilation depending on the patient`s condition and complications.

Antimicrobial therapy can cure most cases of leptospirosis if started early and appropriately. However, some patients may develop chronic or recurrent infections that require prolonged or repeated courses of treatment. Some patients may also develop permanent sequelae such as kidney failure, liver cirrhosis, pulmonary fibrosis, or neurological impairment.

Therefore, prevention of leptospirosis is crucial to avoid its morbidity and mortality. Prevention measures include avoiding contact with contaminated water or soil, wearing protective clothing and footwear when working in high-risk areas, vaccinating animals that may carry the bacteria, and taking prophylactic doxycycline when traveling to endemic regions.

Leptospirosis is a serious but treatable infection that requires prompt diagnosis and management. Antimicrobial therapy can effectively eliminate the bacteria from the body and prevent further complications. However, prevention is better than cure and should be practiced by anyone who may be exposed to Leptospira interrogans.

We are Compiling this Section. Thanks for your understanding.